On July 1st, iGEEKPHONE reported that according to the blogger Wisdom Pikachu’s revelation, the Meizu 22 series will be released this month. It is a brand-new mold-made, truly small-sized new phone, directly competing with the iPhone.
This series of models has already obtained all three certificates. The model number is M582Q. The battery cell capacity on the filing record is 5370mAh, with a typical value of 5500mAh±.
It is reported that this device is positioned as an AI small-screen flagship. With a body width of 71mm, it is a small straight screen that has been deeply refined in terms of hand feel.
Meizu has always had the gene of ultimate hand feel and may create the small straight screen with the strongest hand feel.
In addition, this device is equipped with flagship-level hardware configurations, featuring the Snapdragon 8 Ultra processor. Moreover, it is the first to be equipped with a periscope telephoto lens, which will make up for the previous shortcomings in imaging.
It was previously reported that the Meizu 22 series would come with ultrasonic screen fingerprint recognition as standard across the board. The standard version would focus on the 4,000-yuan price range, while the Pro version would focus on the 5,000-yuan price range.
It should be noted that as early as May this year, some users had posted a large number of false remarks about the Meizu 22 on Weibo.
Among them are “My family bought a Meizu 22 and it’s losing power very quickly.” “The Meizu 22 gets very hot. How can I return it, sisters?” “I bought a Meizu 22, but it froze after just 10 days of use. Who knows, my family?” “The Meizu 22 froze. I want to return it.” “The Meizu 22 has too many bugs and tends to overheat.” And other remarks claiming that the Meizu 22 has product defects.
Startimes Meizu officially released a lawyer’s letter stating that these contents are seriously inconsistent with the facts. The Meizu 22 product has not yet been launched and sold. Such false statements are clearly groundless fabrications and slanderings, malicious slander of the quality of Meizu’s products and groundless speculation about Meizu’s business operations.