For readers interested in using their own e-liquid, our guide to refillable pod vapes explains how refillable systems differ from traditional disposable designs. Instead of treating a vape as something that is simply used and replaced, newer systems are putting more emphasis on refilling, pod flexibility, visible e-liquid levels and longer device lifecycles.
Two Maskking products illustrate this shift particularly well: Maskking CAMO and Maskking UCEE MAX.
At first glance, they look like competitors in the same category. Both use rechargeable 650mAh batteries, dual-mesh technology, refillable pods, visible e-liquid designs and Normal/Boost-style operation. But their approaches are noticeably different.
CAMO is built around a modular platform and a much larger 17ml refillable pod, with a claimed capacity of up to 100,000 puffs when the refill system is used as specified. UCEE MAX is more compact in concept, pairing a 10ml refillable pod with a patented rotating seal system and a claimed 60,000-puff lifespan.
So the interesting question is not simply which one has the higher puff number. It is how the two systems handle long-term use differently.
If you are comparing different long-lasting formats, our guide to 50K vs 70K vs 100K disposable vapes explains what advertised puff counts actually mean in everyday use.
Maskking CAMO vs UCEE MAX: Key Differences
| Feature | Maskking CAMO | Maskking UCEE MAX |
|---|---|---|
| Claimed puff capacity | Up to 100,000 | Up to 60,000 |
| Battery | 650mAh, Type-C | 650mAh, Type-C |
| Main pod | 17ml refillable | 10ml refillable |
| Refill capability | Up to 4 refills | Up to 3 refills |
| Coil | Super Burst dual mesh | 0.6Ω dual mesh |
| Modes | Normal / Boost | Normal / Boost |
| Pod system | Modular magnetic platform | Replaceable/refillable pod |
| Pod visibility | Yes | Yes |
| Special feature | Prefilled + refillable pod flexibility | Patented rotating seal system |
| Design direction | Retro camera-inspired | Ergonomic everyday design |
The specifications above come from Maskking’s published product information. Puff figures are manufacturer claims and should not be interpreted as guaranteed real-world usage.
CAMO Takes a Modular Approach
The most distinctive feature of CAMO is its modular magnetic platform.
Rather than permanently treating the pod and battery as one inseparable unit, CAMO uses a magnetic connection that allows the pod to be changed quickly. Maskking says the system supports both refillable and prefilled pod configurations, giving the device two different usage paths.
That changes the role of the device.
A conventional high-capacity vape is generally built around one specific consumable format. CAMO is closer to a small ecosystem. A user can use a refillable pod when flexibility is important or switch to a prefilled option when convenience is the priority.
The design also contributes to CAMO’s distinctive appearance. Its body takes inspiration from a retro camera, rather than following the familiar rectangular or cylindrical shapes used by many high-capacity vapes.
This makes CAMO less about simply increasing capacity and more about combining longevity with a recognizable hardware concept.
UCEE MAX Focuses on the Refill Experience
UCEE MAX takes a more focused approach.
Its defining feature is the patented Rotating Seal System, which Maskking says is designed to help reduce leakage and preserve flavor by sealing the pod system. The device uses a transparent 10ml refillable pod and supports multiple refill cycles.
This is important because refillable high-capacity devices have a different challenge from traditional disposable products.
Once a pod is intended to be refilled several times, controlling e-liquid exposure, maintaining coil performance and keeping the system convenient become increasingly important. UCEE MAX addresses this with its rotating seal mechanism rather than relying primarily on a modular hardware concept.
The result is a product with a much clearer focus: long-lasting refillable use with an emphasis on sealing, visibility and everyday simplicity.
17ml vs 10ml: Capacity Changes the Ownership Experience
The biggest numerical difference between the two products is pod capacity.
CAMO uses a 17ml refillable pod and supports up to four refills according to Maskking’s published information. The manufacturer claims this configuration can reach up to 100,000 puffs.
UCEE MAX uses a 10ml refillable pod that can be refilled up to three times, with a claimed total usage of more than 60,000 puffs.
That difference is substantial.
CAMO is clearly designed for users who want to minimize interruptions from refilling or replacing pods. The larger reservoir and additional refill cycle give the system a longer intended lifecycle.
UCEE MAX is still a high-capacity product, but it does not push the capacity concept as far. Instead, it puts more of its design attention into the sealing mechanism and balanced everyday operation.
One important caveat: puff counts depend heavily on draw length, power mode, frequency of use and other conditions, so the advertised maximum should be viewed as a manufacturer’s reference rather than a promise of actual usage.
The Two Devices Share the Same Battery Capacity
Interestingly, CAMO and UCEE MAX both use a 650mAh Type-C rechargeable battery.
This makes the comparison more interesting because the difference in claimed overall lifespan does not come from simply putting a dramatically larger battery inside one product.
Instead, the two systems use the same battery capacity as part of different product architectures.
CAMO combines its battery with the larger refillable pod and modular magnetic platform. UCEE MAX pairs the 650mAh battery with its 10ml pod and rotating seal technology.
For everyday use, charging frequency will still depend on the selected mode and vaping habits. Boost operation, for example, can affect power consumption compared with Normal mode.
Dual Mesh Is Central to Both Designs
Both products use dual-mesh coil technology, but Maskking gives CAMO its own Super Burst dual mesh positioning, while UCEE MAX uses a 0.6Ω dual mesh coil.
If you want to learn more about how coil resistance affects vapor production and e-liquid consumption, see our vape coil guide.
Dual mesh is particularly relevant in these long-life systems because the coil is expected to operate across multiple refill cycles.
Maskking says its anti-carbon technology is designed to reduce carbon buildup and help maintain more consistent vapor and flavor performance during repeated refills.
It is worth separating that manufacturer claim from guaranteed performance, however. Coil lifespan varies according to e-liquid composition, usage frequency, power setting and other factors.
The more useful takeaway is that both devices are designed around repeated use rather than a single short consumption cycle.
Visible Pods Make More Sense on Refillable Devices
One of the most practical similarities between CAMO and UCEE MAX is the visible pod.
When a device is designed to be refilled, knowing how much e-liquid remains becomes more important than it is with a sealed disposable.
Both systems allow users to monitor the liquid level visually. Maskking says this can help users know when to refill and reduce the likelihood of continuing to use the device when the pod is running low.
This is a relatively simple feature, but it improves the relationship between the user and the device.
Instead of relying on an estimated puff count or waiting for a noticeable change in performance, the remaining liquid can be checked directly.
CAMO Gives Users More Pod Flexibility
CAMO’s modular design becomes especially useful when considering pod choice.
Maskking says CAMO supports both refillable and prefilled pods.
That makes it more flexible than a system built around only one pod type.
For example, the refillable configuration makes sense when users want to choose their own compatible e-liquid, while the prefilled option is designed around convenience.
This hybrid approach is arguably the biggest conceptual difference between CAMO and UCEE MAX.
UCEE MAX is primarily a refillable high-capacity system. CAMO is trying to turn the same battery platform into a more adaptable pod ecosystem.
UCEE MAX Has a More Specialized Sealing System
The UCEE MAX’s strongest differentiator is not its capacity but its Rotating Seal System.
Maskking describes the mechanism as a way to isolate e-liquid and help reduce leakage and flavor degradation during storage and transportation.
This matters particularly for a refillable device.
The longer a pod is used and the more often it is handled, the more important sealing becomes. UCEE MAX therefore approaches the long-term-use problem from a different direction than CAMO.
CAMO focuses on modularity and capacity.
UCEE MAX focuses more heavily on sealing and controlled refill use.
Normal and Boost Modes Give Both Devices Some Control
Neither product is completely locked into one operating mode.
CAMO offers Normal and Boost modes, while UCEE MAX also provides two selectable output modes.
This gives users a simple way to change the character of the draw without turning the devices into complicated traditional box mods.
Normal mode is positioned for a smoother everyday experience, while Boost mode is intended for stronger vapor production and a more intense draw.
The important point is that both systems preserve relatively simple controls despite their more sophisticated internal designs.
Which One Fits Your Usage Style?
Instead of choosing purely according to the highest puff number, consider how you expect to use the device.
CAMO makes more sense for users who prioritize:
- A very large refillable pod
- Longer claimed overall lifespan
- A modular magnetic connection
- The option of refillable or prefilled pods
- A distinctive retro-camera-inspired design
- Normal and Boost modes
- Visible e-liquid monitoring
- A more flexible pod ecosystem
The combination of a 17ml pod, multiple refills and modular platform is what gives CAMO its identity.
UCEE MAX is more focused on:
- A high-capacity refillable setup
- A 10ml visible pod
- A compact everyday concept
- Dual-mesh performance
- Normal and Boost modes
- A dedicated sealing mechanism
- Reduced concern about e-liquid leakage
- A simpler refillable-pod workflow
Its rotating seal system is the feature that most clearly separates UCEE MAX from other high-capacity refillable devices.
CAMO vs UCEE MAX: What Actually Separates Them?
The two devices are close enough in hardware fundamentals to make the comparison interesting, but different enough in philosophy that they should not be treated as interchangeable.
CAMO is the more modular concept. Its 17ml refillable pod, multiple refill cycles, magnetic platform and support for both refillable and prefilled pods give it a broader ecosystem. Its claimed 100,000-puff maximum also places it firmly in the ultra-high-capacity segment.
UCEE MAX is the more focused refillable system. Its 10ml pod, claimed 60,000-puff lifespan, dual-mesh coil and patented rotating seal system are centered on long-term everyday use without adding as much modular complexity.
That distinction is more useful than simply comparing 100K against 60K.
If your priority is maximum capacity and pod flexibility, CAMO’s architecture is the more relevant one to examine. If your priority is a straightforward refillable system with dedicated sealing technology, UCEE MAX offers a different approach.
Either way, the advertised puff count should be treated as a manufacturer’s maximum claim rather than a guaranteed lifespan.
Nicotine warning: These products may be available in nicotine-containing configurations depending on the market and product version. Nicotine is addictive. These products are intended only for adults of legal purchasing age where permitted. Always check local regulations and follow the manufacturer’s instructions.