The Ursa family of pod kits from Ursa Vapor has gained a reputation for delivering exceptional vaping experiences. In this review, we will compare two popular models from the Ursa lineup: the Ursa Nano Pod and the Ursa Pocket. Both devices offer unique features and cater to different vaping preferences. Let’s dive into the details and find out which one suits your needs best.
Design
The Ursa Pocket boasts a pocket-friendly design with dimensions of 95.246.219mm, making it incredibly compact and easy to carry around. It features a sturdy zinc-alloy construction with textured plates on both sides, providing an attractive and ergonomic grip. The device’s pattern can change color depending on the light and angle, adding a touch of visual appeal.
On the other hand, the Ursa Nano Pod showcases an excellent design and construction with its zinc alloy build. Its slim profile, measuring roughly half an inch thick, ensures a comfortable feel in the hand and effortless portability. The beveled sides and glossy front and back color panels enhance its overall aesthetic.
Features
The Ursa Pocket is designed for beginners and MTL (mouth-to-lung) enthusiasts. It offers a refillable and leak-proof pod system compatible with a wide range of nic salts, ensuring a fantastic taste experience. The kit comes with two coil resistance options (1.0ohm or 0.8ohm) to cater to different flavor preferences. Powered by an 800mAh battery, it delivers up to 18W of power, providing a satisfying throat hit.
On the other hand, the Ursa Nano Pod is tailored toward fans of retro gaming. It features a powerful chipset and offers two mini-games for added entertainment. The device’s maximum power of 30 watts automatically adjusts based on the inserted cartridge, allowing for a customizable vaping experience. It comes with a built-in 1200mAh battery that charges conveniently via USB-C. The Ursa Nano Pod is compatible with Ursa series cartridges, ensuring versatility for users.
Battery
The Ursa Pocket houses an 800mAh battery, providing a decent amount of power for its compact size. With an intelligent charging indication, you can easily monitor the battery’s status and ensure a hassle-free vaping experience. The battery’s capacity is suitable for casual vapers or those who prefer shorter vaping sessions.
In comparison, the Ursa Nano Pod comes equipped with a larger 1200mAh integrated battery. This increased capacity allows for longer vaping sessions before needing to recharge. The USB-C charging ensures faster and more efficient charging times, keeping downtime to a minimum.
Conclusion
Both the Ursa Nano Pod and Ursa Pocket offer unique features and cater to different vaping preferences. The Ursa Pocket is an excellent choice for beginners and MTL enthusiasts who prioritize portability and a satisfying throat hit. Its compact design, textured plates, and compatibility with a variety of nic salts make it a versatile option.
On the other hand, the Ursa Nano Pod appeals to retro gaming enthusiasts with its gaming features and powerful chipset. The larger battery capacity and compatibility with Ursa series cartridges make it suitable for vapers who prefer longer sessions and customization options.
Ultimately, the choice between the Ursa Nano Pod and Ursa Pocket depends on your vaping preferences. Consider factors such as size, power range, compatibility, and design aesthetics to determine which device aligns best with your needs and style. Both devices showcase Ursa Vapor’s commitment to delivering quality vaping experiences, ensuring that you can’t go wrong with either choice.