As the vaping industry continues to evolve, the market is flooded with a plethora of devices catering to different preferences and needs. In this review article, we will compare two popular pod systems from Lost Vape: the Ursa Pocket Vape and the Ursa Nano Pro. These compact devices offer distinct features and functionalities, providing vapers with an enjoyable and personalized vaping experience. By examining their design, features, battery capabilities, and overall performance, we aim to help users make an informed decision when choosing between the Ursa Pocket Vape and Ursa Nano Pro.
Design
The Ursa Pocket Vape showcases a captivating design, particularly appealing to retro gaming enthusiasts. Its sleek and compact form factor makes it highly portable, fitting comfortably in a hand or pocket. The device features a 1.7″ OLED display, providing clear visibility of essential information such as battery life, wattage, and puff count. Additionally, the Ursa Pocket Vape incorporates a rear-side LED system that illuminates with each puff, adding a touch of flair to the overall aesthetic.
On the other hand, the Ursa Nano Pro boasts a more streamlined and minimalist design. With dimensions of 24x14x94.4mm, it offers a pocket-friendly solution for on-the-go vaping. The 0.42″ OLED screen provides users with key vaping data, ensuring convenient control and monitoring of settings. The Ursa Nano Pro features adjustable airflow control, allowing users to fine-tune their vaping experience according to their preferences.
Features
The Ursa Pocket Vape, equipped with a powerful chipset, delivers a maximum power output of 30 watts. The device automatically adjusts its wattage based on the inserted cartridge, ensuring optimal performance. Users have the option to activate the device through an automatic draw or by pressing the button. The Ursa Pocket Vape is compatible with Ursa series cartridges, further expanding the range of vaping options available. Additionally, the device offers two mini-games, enhancing the user experience beyond traditional vaping.
In comparison, the Ursa Nano Pro utilizes the Lost Vape Quest chipset, enabling an output range of 9 to 25 watts. This flexibility empowers vapers to customize their vaping experience according to their preferences. The device features a refillable pod system with a 2.5ml e-juice capacity (2ml for TPD compliance), allowing for convenient and hassle-free refills via a side-filling mechanism. The inclusion of replaceable or integrated coil pods ensures excellent flavor and vapor production.
Battery
The Ursa Pocket Vape comes equipped with a built-in 1200mAh battery, offering ample power for prolonged vaping sessions. The USB-C charging port facilitates fast and efficient recharging, ensuring minimal downtime between sessions. This battery capacity, coupled with the device’s automatic power adjustment, provides vapers with a reliable and consistent vaping experience.
In comparison, the Ursa Nano Pro is equipped with a built-in 900mAh battery. While slightly lower in capacity, it still offers satisfactory battery life for most vapers. The device’s compact size makes it convenient for recharging on the go. With the Quest chipset optimizing power output, users can expect efficient battery utilization and extended vaping sessions before recharging becomes necessary.
Conclusion
Both the Ursa Pocket Vape and Ursa Nano Pro exemplify Lost Vape’s commitment to providing vapers with high-quality, user-friendly pod systems. The Ursa Pocket Vape stands out with its retro gaming-inspired design, impressive power output, and unique LED system. It offers an engaging vaping experience with the inclusion of mini-games. On the other hand, the Ursa Nano Pro boasts a more minimalist design, adjustable airflow control, and versatile coil options. It is an excellent choice for vapers seeking a compact device that delivers both flavor and vapor production.
Ultimately, the choice between the Ursa Pocket Vape and Ursa Nano Pro depends on individual preferences. Vapers looking for a visually appealing device with higher power capabilities and added entertainment value may gravitate toward the Ursa Pocket Vape. On the other hand, those seeking a sleek, compact, and customizable vaping experience may find the Ursa Nano Pro more appealing. Both devices offer a reliable and satisfying vaping experience, ensuring that users can enjoy their favorite e-liquids with ease and convenience.
Read Also: LOSTVAPE URSA Pocket vs. OrionBar OB-75 Comparison Review
Do not forget to follow us on our Facebook group and page to keep you always aware of the latest advances, News, Updates, review, and giveaway on smartphones, tablets, gadgets, and more from the technology world of the future.
