The Xiaomi Civi 3 and the Vivo S17 are similar in positioning. Both are slim and lightweight smartphones that emphasize their camera capabilities. While there’s a price difference of about 300 yuan for the same storage version of these two phones, notable differences in their configurations make it challenging to decide. If you prioritize cost-effectiveness and performance, the Xiaomi Civi3 is worth considering. On the other hand, the vivo S17 comes at a slightly higher cost, but it offers more configuration upgrades.
In terms of display, the Xiaomi Civi 3 features a 6.55-inch curved screen with 12-bit color, 1920Hz high-frequency PWM dimming, 1500nit peak brightness, and a resolution of 2400×1080. Although it has a 1080P resolution, the color reproduction, eye protection, and intelligence are excellent. Meanwhile, the vivo S17 has a larger 6.78-inch curved screen supporting 1.07 billion colors, 1300nit peak brightness, 2160Hz high-frequency PWM dimming, and a resolution 2800×1260. The Xiaomi Civi3 excels in screen brightness and color display, while the vivo S17 offers a higher definition and some advantages in eye protection. Overall, the shows on both models are pretty competitive.
Regarding hardware, the vivo S17 is powered by the Snapdragon 778G+ processor, while the Xiaomi Civi3 utilizes the Dimensity 8200 Ultra processor. Both phones offer smooth performance in daily use and moderate to low-intensity gaming scenarios, but the Xiaomi Civi3 boasts significantly stronger performance. So, if gaming is your priority, the Xiaomi Civi3 would be the better choice.
As for the cameras, both phones are equipped with impressive camera capabilities that resemble those found in flagship models. The Xiaomi Civi 3 features two 32-megapixel high-definition front-facing cameras for better selfie options. On the back, it sports a Sony IMX800 50-megapixel primary camera with OIS optical image stabilization, an 8-megapixel wide-angle lens, and a 2-megapixel macro lens. Xiaomi’s image tuning leans towards vivid colors, resulting in well-balanced performance in various scenarios. On the other hand, the vivo S17 boasts a 50-megapixel front-facing camera and a rear-mounted Samsung GN5 50-megapixel primary camera with OIS, along with an 8-megapixel wide-angle lens. The vivo S17 stands out in portrait photography and offers a soft light feature for capturing smooth effects in low-light conditions.
Regarding battery life and charging, the Xiaomi Civi 3 packs a 4500mAh battery with 67W flash charging, while the vivo S17 comes with a slightly larger 4600mAh battery and faster 80W flash charging. Although the vivo S17 charges more quickly, the battery life advantage is insignificant.
In addition to the above distinctions, the Xiaomi Civi3 is lighter and comes with extra features such as infrared functions and linear motors compared to the vivo S17, which adds to its appeal.
In summary, both phones have their strengths and weaknesses. The vivo S17, despite being pricier, excels in self-timer capabilities, battery life, and faster charging. On the other hand, the Xiaomi Civi3 offers superior performance, a well-balanced overall configuration, and a more affordable price, making it a more cost-effective option.