You can sue the at-fault motorist for compensation if you’ve suffered significant and lasting injuries in a vehicle accident. In Ontario, the standard policy maximum is $1,000,000. Additional benefits can be purchased to improve coverage, although only a small percentage of Ontarians do so (mainly personal injury attorneys, insurance adjusters, insurance brokers, and insurance defense lawyers). If you keep looking into it, you’ll notice a trend quite quickly. Getting a personal injury lawyer in Richmond Hill is one of the best things you can do if you’re going through a personal injury.
In certain situations, the policy limitations are more than a million dollars. Commercial carriers frequently have coverage limits of $5,000,000 or more. Your vehicle insurance and house insurance may be combined to form something known as an umbrella policy. An umbrella policy can result in higher policy limits ranging from $1,000,000 to $2,000,000.
When insurance restrictions are higher, it can be seen as a positive thing for a wounded person. This implies that, if the claimant is fully permitted to compensation, they will be able to recover and gain access to more benefits in their personal injury case. To grasp the idea of recovery, consider what occurs when policy limits are insufficient to cover a claim.
Assume the claim is valued at $1,500,000, but the policy only allows for a $1,000,000 maximum. According to the insurance policy, the initial $1,000,000 is covered by the company providing insurance. In the end, there will be a deficit of $500,000 for the claim.
The defendant will be in charge of covering the $500,000 deficit if they don’t have a policy that covers the additional amounts. This sum of $500,000 is not covered by a regular vehicle insurance policy. The plaintiff can obtain an individual opinion against the defendant and confiscate or attach his or her assets, or perhaps even forfeit his or her earnings until the judgment is fulfilled. Keep in mind that Ontario Works payments are NOT garnishable. Regular paychecks/wages, on the other hand, are liable to garnishment.
Defendants are frequently judgment-resistant. Or, instead, they will make themselves judgment resistant after the occurrence. They will liquidate all of their potential assets. In certain situations, the following phrases ring true:
- You should sue people that come with a lot of money
- You aren’t able to obtain blood from a stone
This is why the plaintiffs’ ability to recover under those insurance restrictions is so important. The money under the insurance policy is sometimes the only actual money that the wounded Plaintiff has access to.
To decide who gets what sum of money under the policy, many Plaintiffs may have to contest against one another. Often, judicial action is necessary to determine who gets what amount of money. A judge will be called upon to decide on the distribution of insurance limits. Consider the total amount of money under the policy as a pizza or a beautiful cookie in basic words.
You’re not going to be able to make another pizza or cookie. There is just one of them. The plaintiffs will have to split the pizza or cookie The damages, losses, and injuries suffered by the plaintiff shall be divided proportionately. The plaintiff who has been hurt the most will receive the highest compensation. The Plaintiff who has been hurt the least shall receive the least compensation. It’s a zero-sum competition because what one Plaintiff receives, the other Plaintiff doesn’t get.
Under a normal $1,000,000 vehicle insurance plan, if there are three distinct Plaintiffs and the parties mutually agree that damages should be distributed 60 percent for Plaintiff A, 30 percent for Plaintiff B, and 10 percent for Plaintiff C, damages will be paid as follows:
- Plaintiff A will be getting $600,000 or 60 percent
- Plaintiff B will be getting $300,000 or 30 percent
- Plaintiff C will be getting $100,000 or 10 percent
- The total will equal 100 percent
Any monies in excess of the aforementioned amounts must be recovered beyond the insurance. Except in cases where the defendant has real assets, amounts far beyond the insurance limitations are unlikely to be collected by the plaintiffs.
Throughout a lot of different personal injury cases, there are several plaintiffs or injured parties involved in a specific injury claim. Simultaneously, there may well be only one defendant who is responsible for the plaintiffs’ damages.
What occurs when there is only one money pool to get the money? In some of these situations, one plaintiff could agree to a settlement in principle. However, due to the policy limitations problem, the defendant’s insurer will not engage in a formal settlement. Should the entirety of the claims exceed the policy limitations, the Defendant insurer cannot put his or her insured to individual accountability.
This implies that if a Plaintiff can reach an agreement with the defendant but the other two Plaintiffs are unable to, the remaining Plaintiff must wait until the other two Plaintiffs can resolve their claims. Alternatively, the parties can all rush to trial at the same time. A savvy Defendant, on the other hand, will file a request to have the claims tested simultaneously so that they are all in sync. As a result, a lag in one scenario causes delays in the other two.
If you’re looking for a personal injury lawyer in Richmond Hill that will help you access as many benefits as you can, contact GSK Law today.